1 min readDec 23, 2019
- Those aren’t answers. All you’ve done is point to additional claims and assertions. A claim about something and evidence for something are two different things.
- “I don’t believe on the Big Bang.” Science doesn’t care about what you believe.
- If existence is so amazing and complex that only a Complex Celestial Being could have made it, well, who made the Celestial Being? There is no escaping the problem of infinite regress.
- I suppose “holy” might be used in a colloquial or secularized way (just as the word “divine” has a secular usage), but it’s a word I would never use.
- Calvinists believe in the “spiritual presence” of Christ in the wafer; Catholics believe in the literal presence of Christ in the wafer. I fail to see the attraction in believing in either belief.
- There is no evidence that a Supreme Law Giver is the source of our moral instincts. Evolution explains why we are moral creatures. No religion has any explanation that accounts for why humans can be moral beings.
- That you want to give this god you believe in a pass on killing indiscriminately, to kill at any time, suggests a psychopathic tendency — that is, in you: the person who believes this.
- The story of Jonah and the aquatic animal is on par with the story of Little Red Riding Hood. Both are fictions.
- So you’re confirming that God is a murderous psychopath. Thanks for clearing that up.
- You dodged my question about Satan.
